- Advisers will increasingly need to guide clients through a wide range of ESG options.
- There is no one-size-fits-all approach to ESG, which is why it can be helpful to start the conversation by establishing the client’s goals and preferences.
- Do they want an active or index ESG approach? Do they want to divest from certain companies or sectors – or own and engage? These are just some of the questions that can help you to define your client’s goals.
By Fong-Yee Chan, head of ESG strategy, Vanguard Europe.
Investors interested in environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing have a rapidly growing range of products to choose from, with the market share of ESG-focused mutual funds and ETFs in Europe growing from 8% in 2017 to 18% last year1.
With this expanding universe comes a growing need for advice on ESG options, with the topic coming up in roughly one in five conversations with advisers2.
There are many different ways to reflect ESG considerations through investment products and processes. These range from stewardship (the promotion of effective company governance through activities such as engagement and voting) and ESG integration (the inclusion of material ESG information in investment analysis and decision making), through to products with a formal ESG mandate or label.
Vanguard has developed a four-stage framework to help advisers navigate the ESG landscape and the first step – defining your client’s goals – can help you to assess the different ESG options and decide on an appropriate approach.
Values preference, financial benefit or positive change?
One way to determine a client’s ESG objectives – and therefore the best course of action for them – is to ask what they are trying to achieve by looking to address certain ESG issues.
Your client may have certain ethical, moral, religious, humanitarian, political and/or environmental beliefs, which may determine the ESG approach they wish to take. For example, a company may be conducting a legal business activity, but the investor may not want to co-profit from it because it is at odds with his or her values. This values preference may be so strong that the investor would be prepared to sacrifice a financial return.
Alternatively, the client may be seeking to generate a financial benefit, such as enhancing risk-adjusted return or reducing certain types of risk. For instance, an investor may want to invest in renewable energy companies because they believe they will benefit from the transition to a low-carbon economy.
They may want to bring about positive environmental, social or governance-related changes on one or more issues that concern them. For example, they may want to influence a change in working conditions for employees of certain companies or sectors.
Finally, the investor may have to follow certain ESG-related requirements, such as specific exclusions, set by an external party such as a regulator.
The client’s objectives may vary by different ESG issue and are not mutually exclusive – they may want to generate a financial benefit as well as bring about positive change, for example. There is no one-size-fits-all approach, which is why it is helpful to start the ESG conversation by establishing a client’s goals before deciding on a suitable approach.
Once you have understood your client’s goals, the following additional questions can help determine which ESG options might be most appropriate:
Divestment or engagement?
There is an ongoing debate in the industry as to whether investors should divest from (or sell) certain companies because of their business activities, or continue to own them and engage with them on managing ESG risks. To a large extent, this will depend on what the investor is trying to achieve by incorporating ESG criteria into their investments.
If the investor is looking to align their investments with their personal values, then they may wish to divest – or, in other words, exclude certain sectors, securities or issuers – that are not in line with those values.
However, if the investor wants to influence positive change in the economy, in society or in the environment, they may feel it is more effective to own certain companies and – through their asset manager – have a seat at the table to engage with the company board and encourage better management of ESG issues.
Ahead of last year’s United Nations climate change conference (COP26) in Glasgow, MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee emphasised the importance of engagement over divestment to encourage the transition to a lower-carbon economy, saying “encouraging behaviour change in companies through good stewardship is more likely to be an effective approach to help the real economy transition to net zero” 3.
At Vanguard, we offer both approaches. As long-term owners of the companies in which our funds invest, our global stewardship team engages with companies on material ESG issues that can impact long-term value for investors.
For some investors, however, owning certain companies is not consistent with their values. That is why we also offer ESG index funds that allow investors to avoid certain ESG risks by screening out (or excluding) companies or sectors, based on specific criteria. These could be non-renewable energy companies, for example, or weapons or tobacco manufacturers.